Which of the following might be a conflict of interest for a person-centered planning facilitator?

The correct choice is comprehensive because each of the scenarios presented indicates a potential conflict of interest for a person-centered planning facilitator.

When a facilitator is employed by the same organization that provides support to the focus person, a risk arises that the facilitator may prioritize the organization's interests over the individual's needs and desires. This dual loyalty can hinder the objective guidance that a person-centered approach requires, potentially disempowering the focus person's voice in the planning process.

If the facilitator is overbooked and unable to dedicate sufficient time or energy to the planning sessions, this can compromise the quality of support provided. The essence of person-centered planning is to ensure that the focus person's preferences and goals are genuinely heard and integrated; inadequate attention from the facilitator can lead to subpar planning efforts that do not accurately reflect the individual's aspirations.

Furthermore, if the focus person shows a lack of interest in participating, it indicates a disconnect between the planning facilitator's role and the individual's needs and desires. An effective facilitator should ensure that the planning process is meaningful and relevant to the focus person, and if they are not engaged or interested, it raises questions about the appropriateness of the facilitator's role in that scenario.

Hence, because each of these circumstances can undermine the integrity of the person-centered planning