What was the general perception of institutions during their peak?

The answer indicating that institutions were often criticized for lack of humanitarian care reflects a significant historical perspective on institutions, particularly those established for individuals with disabilities or mental health issues. During their peak, many such institutions were intended to provide care and support, but in practice, they often fell short of their mission.

Reports and public sentiment highlighted several issues such as overcrowding, inadequate staffing, and poor living conditions. These criticisms shed light on the failure to prioritize the dignity and humanity of the individuals housed in these institutions. Rather than being places of healing and hope, many institutions became known for their harsh treatment and neglect, leading to a growing movement advocating for reform and deinstitutionalization.

The other choices touch on positive aspects that some might have viewed about institutions or fringe benefits they were intended to provide, but they do not accurately capture the predominant sentiment of criticism that emerged over time regarding humanitarian care. This context is essential to understand the evolving view on such institutions and their legacy.