What is the ethical issue when a direct support professional prioritizes their own needs over an individual's ability to work on a holiday?

When a direct support professional prioritizes their own needs over an individual's ability to work on a holiday, the ethical issue is primarily centered around the DSP's interests taking precedence over the individual's needs. This situation highlights a critical aspect of the direct support profession, which emphasizes the importance of putting the individuals they support at the forefront of their practice.

The role of a direct support professional is to empower individuals, respect their choices, and support their independence. By prioritizing personal needs over the individual's opportunity to work, the DSP is not fulfilling their ethical obligation to advocate for and support the individual's autonomy and preferences. This places the DSP's interests above the individual's right to make choices about their own life and opportunities, undermining the fundamental goals of person-centered support.

While the notion of self-determination is significant in this context, the essence of the ethical breach lies in the fact that the DSP has favored their own priorities instead of considering what is best for the individual. This disregard for the individual's needs directly reflects on the DSP's commitment to their role and the ethical standards they are expected to uphold.