If you are taking action in the best interest of the person you support, do you need to get informed consent?

In the context of supporting individuals, the requirement for informed consent often hinges on the nature of the action being taken. If the action does not involve any significant risk, personal decision-making, or changes in the individual's rights or welfare, then obtaining informed consent might not be strictly necessary.

The essence of this approach underscores an understanding that when actions are taken for the person's immediate benefit and well-being, especially in routine or established care situations, practitioners or supporters may operate under the assumption that the individual's best interests are being served without needing formal consent each time.

However, it is crucial to understand that the concept of informed consent is rooted in ethical practices and respects the autonomy of the individual. Therefore, in many cases, even when actions seem to be in the best interest of the person, seeking consent is a fundamental safeguard that fosters trust and respects the individual’s rights. In certain sensitive situations or decisions, even well-meaning interventions require informed consent to uphold ethical standards and to ensure that individuals are empowered to make decisions about their own lives.

This balance reflects the need to consider both the well-being of the individual and the necessity of informed consent as a principle that protects their rights and personal agency.